Join us on Facebook!
Join us in our forums!
Get your tickets to Tolkien today!
Join us on Instagram

Latest Tweets

  1. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: “It’s definitely strange going into lockdown with people that you have just started working with, But I obviously w… https://t.co/Jq6K0ew5mP

  2. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Let's do a cosplay content for #HobbitDay shall we? Prepare your attire for a party of special magnificence today a… https://t.co/4aQ1wB36Cg

  3. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Better than this was the Man of Steel teaser using Howard Shore’s epic lament to Gandalf from LOTR under a powerful… https://t.co/5b7Nd8O3mA

Why The Hobbit movie’s divergences are beneficial

September 13, 2013 at 10:45 pm by Demosthenes  - 

The Hobbit Bag End Door Another interesting thought-piece that I stumbled on in my Middle-earth wanderings across the internet. In this article, Tolkien scholar Michael Martinez tackles the eternally vexing question of textual fidelity and why he feels that the divergences between novel and film are beneficial.


THERE is a certain amount of creative license that enters into any film adaptation of a book. And history teaches us that no matter how faithful (or unfaithful) a film adaptation is with respect to its original source, someone will complain about the movie’s (un)faithfulness to the books.

For example, I loved the first two “Harry Potter” movies, which I felt were extremely imaginative and creative. I had never seen children’s movies before where the actors were actually called upon to ACT. Compare the lively, engaged performances of the adults in “Harry Potter and the Sorceror’s Stone” with the wooden performances of otherwise perfectly good actors in classic children’s films like “Mio in the Land of Faraway”, “The Witches”, “The Neverending Story”, and so on. You almost have to go back to Edmund Guinn in “Miracle on 34th Street” to see anything like an adult actor taking a children’s story seriously enough to treat it with respect (well, “Mary Poppins” and “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” were pretty good).

But I digress from the main point. Movies can be very faithful to the book, and one of the criticisms that my Harry Potter fan friends who had read the books before watching the movies complained about was that the movies were boring and predictable. They followed the books very closely (even while cutting out a bit of material).

But then along came “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban”, which Alfonso Cuarón directed — totally changing the tone and character of the film franchise — and people complained that his film was too UNLIKE the book. Talk about injecting a Goldilocks Syndrome into a fanbase, you just cannot find people agreeing on when the “Harry Potter” movies are just right even up to the last film (which some people hate for all sorts of reasons — but I loved it).

[Read More]

Posted in Green Books, Hobbit Book, Hobbit Movie, J.R.R. Tolkien, The Hobbit, Tolkien on September 13, 2013 by
Source: Xenite.org

Check out the Bilbo Contract from WETA Workshop

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *