Join us on Facebook!
Join us in our forums!
Get your tickets to Tolkien today!
Join us on Instagram

Latest Tweets

  1. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Can we all agree in the wake of Hamilton - now is the perfect time to do a musical reboot of the Hobbit for Broadwa… https://t.co/IURpUEYgZA

  2. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Collecting The Precious – Elessar’s Collection Update 2020 https://t.co/Czmi576EyA https://t.co/kkK9QQvd8w

  3. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Looks like Dominic Monaghan is playing D&D tonight! Check out @DomsWildThings over on le twitch https://t.co/JiiIQmLC4k

News Alerts

Get emailed with every new post!

Why Tom Bombadil is not Aule

November 7, 2012 at 4:28 am by Demosthenes  - 

The question of Tom Bombadil is one of the longest-running debates in Tolkien’s Middle-earth. Of all the possible answers that have been thrown around, the suggestion that he could be Aule the smith — and Goldberry therefore Yavanna — seems to have unusual tenacity. Steuard Jensen, maintainer of the The Tolkien Newsgroups FAQ, explains in this detailed essay why it is a flawed theory.

This essay is an extension of his original essay What is Tom Bombadil? that specifically addresses the flaws in the Aule theory.

As Jensen himself writes:

In my full essay “What is Tom Bombadil”, I categorize the idea that he is the Vala Aule as a “theory with fatal flaws”. Although I believe my arguments there to be more than sufficient, many readers have considered them too brief and dismissive and claim instead that Gene Hargrove’s detailed and well written essay “Who is Tom Bombadil?” makes a compelling case that I have not refuted.

I have a great deal of respect for Hargrove’s writing; indeed, the desire to improve on his conclusions while doing justice to the quality of his article was one of my own motives in exploring the topic. I intentionally did not frame any portion of my essay explicitly as a refutation of his article because that felt far more negative and adversarial than I wanted to be. But as his flawed theory has continued to be very popular in the ten years since my essay appeared, it seems to be worth confronting the claim that Bombadil is Aule in detail. I will begin by collecting all of my arguments against it in one place (many taken directly from my full essay), and then I will address Hargrove’s arguments in its favor.

Essay: Why Bombadil cannot be Aule

Posted in Fellowship of the Ring, Green Books, Lord of the Rings, LotR Books on November 7, 2012 by
Source: The Tolkien Meta-FAQ

Daggers of Tauriel

One response to “Why Tom Bombadil is not Aule”

  1. Colin Speirs says:

    Bombadil is Aulë! How preposterous!

    I mean!

    As if!

    He’s Illuvatar, of course!

Leave a Reply