Join us on Facebook!
Join us in our forums!
Get your tickets to Tolkien today!
Join us on Instagram

News Alerts

Get emailed with every new post!

Weekly Newsletter

Select a list:

Will Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit change cinema for ever?

April 13, 2011 at 2:26 pm by newsfrombree  - 

Peter Bradshaw at The Guardian has an interesting article today about what the future holds now that Peter Jackson is filming in 48fps:

The cinema, said Jean-Luc Godard, is truth, 24 times per second. That’s not truthful enough for some people. This week, Peter Jacksonannounced that he is shooting his new version of The Hobbit at 48 frames per second, a massively more expensive process that captures movement and detail with far greater accuracy. In his blog, Jackson says that we have tolerated the sprockety old 24fps speed for far too long, and this is like “the moment when vinyl records were supplanted by digital CDs”. Jackson calls for cinemas worldwide to switch over to 48fps projection speeds to show his Hobbit, which is of course in 3D; he dismisses “purists” unhappy at the consequent textural loss of blur and strobing – comparable, perhaps, to art historians who lament the cleaning of an Old Master canvas, which removes its grainy, characterful darkness.

Are we witnessing that most unreliable phenomenon: the game-changer?

[Read More] (Thanks to Ringer Irfon and QuackingTroll for the tip!)

Posted in Director news, Director Rumors, Hobbit Movie, Miscellaneous, Peter Jackson, The Hobbit on April 13, 2011 by Source: The Guardian Will Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit change cinema for ever? | Discuss
Thranduil Statue

3 responses to “Will Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit change cinema for ever?”

  1. obsessed with the technology of film making is never a good sign. symptom of lucas disease.

  2. Anonymous says:

    I don’t mind 3D being available, but I’d be very bothered indeed if it were the only option. It would end up excluding many of his fans, as 3D is dangerous for seizure-sufferers like myself. It’s not a matter of taste, it’s a matter of my safety. I shouldn’t have to risk my life to see the Hobbit, and I’d be gutted if this film wasn’t safe for me to see.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I don’t mind 3D being available, but I’d be very bothered indeed if it were the only option. It would end up excluding many of his fans, as 3D is dangerous for seizure-sufferers like myself. It’s not a matter of taste, it’s a matter of my safety. I shouldn’t have to risk my life to see the Hobbit, and I’d be gutted if this film wasn’t safe for me to see.

Leave a Reply