{"id":38803,"date":"2010-09-26T14:13:24","date_gmt":"2010-09-26T19:13:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/?p=38803"},"modified":"2010-09-27T21:15:39","modified_gmt":"2010-09-28T02:15:39","slug":"peter-jackson-takes-the-gloves-off","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/2010\/09\/26\/38803-peter-jackson-takes-the-gloves-off\/","title":{"rendered":"Peter Jackson Takes the Gloves Off"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"intro\"><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-34523\" href=\"http:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/2009\/12\/21\/34709-peter-jackson-to-adapt-sci-fi-series\/peter_jackson_image\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-34523 no-lazyload\" title=\"Peter Jackson\" src=\"http:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/peter_jackson_image-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a>Peter Jackson has issued a swift and decisive statement in answer to recent suggestions by the IFA and affiliated actor&#8217;s unions that their members turn down parts in &#8220;The Hobbit&#8221; movie unless all New Zealand actors are allowed to bargain with the movie-makers collectively. Peter made the interesting point that this may be against current New Zealand law:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>&#8220;NZ law prohibits engaging in collective bargaining with any labour  organisation representing performers who are independent contractors, as  film actors clearly are. The NZ Commerce Act claims it would be  unlawful to engage with an Australian Union on these matters.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>More worrisome for Hobbit fans is his assertion that this may delay the making of &#8220;The Hobbit&#8221; even further and\/or force the production to move to eastern Europe:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>..&#8221;the &#8220;demands&#8221; of MEAA cannot be agreed to, or even considered &#8211; by law &#8211;  and therefore the only options that remain involve closing the <em>Hobbit<\/em> down, or more likely shifting the production to Europe. It could so  easily happen. I&#8217;ve been told that Disney are no longer bring movies to  Australia because of their frustration with the MEAA.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The MEAA is the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance, or the actors union in Australia. The IFA and New Zealand Actors guild solicited the help of the Aussie organization in 2006 to help the unionization process of New Zealand actors. Keep reading to see the entire statement and be sure to join the <a href=\"http:\/\/newboards.theonering.net\/forum\/gforum\/perl\/gforum.cgi?post=280199;sb=post_time;so=DESC;forum_view=forum_view_expanded;\">discussion on our message boards<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Statement regarding The Hobbit and claims by the Australian Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA):<\/p>\n<p>The Australian Labour Union, the MEAA is using our production <em>The Hobbit <\/em>in  an attempt to widen it&#8217;s membership, and power within the New Zealand  film industry. As a New Zealand filmmaker, who has nothing to hide or be  ashamed about, I&#8217;m not going to see this threatening behaviour continue  without some form of sensible discussion about the &#8220;facts&#8221; and &#8220;truth&#8221;  behind their various allegations.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s incredibly easy to wave the flag on behalf of workers and target  the rich studios. It&#8217;s not hard to generate an emotive response, nor is  it hard to sway public opinion, since nobody seems to like the facts to  get in the way of a good story in these situations.<\/p>\n<p>Behind the claims of exploiting actors who are cast in the &#8220;non-Union&#8221; <em>Hobbit<\/em> production, and claims that various high-profile stars will refuse to  take part in the films, there are clear agendas at work. As usual with  these agendas, they are based on money and power.<\/p>\n<p>I am not a lawyer, nor am I an expert in unions and how they operate &#8211;  but I like to think I have a degree of common sense, and that&#8217;s what  I&#8217;m basing my observations on. Let me run over a few facts:<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Personally speaking, I&#8217;m not anti-Union in the slightest. I&#8217;m a  very proud and loyal member of three Hollywood Unions &#8211; the Directors  Guild, the Producers Guild and the Writers Guild. I support the Screen  Actors Guild (SAG). All these organisations (I must confess I&#8217;m not  entirely sure what the difference is between a &#8220;Guild&#8221; and a &#8220;Union&#8221;) do  terrific work on behalf of their members.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Many Actors are members of SAG, but many are not &#8212; especially  younger actors and many Australian and New Zealand performers. MEAA  claims we are &#8220;non-Union&#8221;, but whenever we hire an actor who belongs to  SAG, we always honour their working conditions, their minimum salary  agreements and their residuals.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; The SAG residuals is a small pot of money that comes from the  movie&#8217;s profits. The DGA and WGA have similar schemes. An agreed upon  percentage of movie profits is placed in a pot, which is shared amongst  the members of the guild who worked on the film in question. Despite  MEAA claims that <em>The Hobbit<\/em> is &#8220;non-Union&#8221;, our studio, Warner  Brothers, is honouring these residuals, and making the profit sharing  available to all the various Guild members &#8211; just as it did on <em>The Lord of the Rings<\/em>, and Universal did on <em>King Kong<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; These residuals can be worth tens of thousands of dollars to an  individual if the film is successful &#8211; however the normal situation is  that if an actor is not a member of SAG, they do not share in the profit  pot.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; This has always struck us as unfair, since most Kiwi actors are not lucky enough to be SAG members. For the <em>Hobbit<\/em>,  Warner Brothers have agreed to create a separate pot of profit  participation, which will be divided up amongst non-SAG actors who are  cast in the film. This was not done because of any pressure from Guilds  or Unions &#8211; it was actually Warners doing the decent thing, and New  Zealand and Australian actors will be the principle beneficiaries. SAG  members have their pot, and non-SAG members now have theirs. We have  introduced the scheme to Kiwi agents and it&#8217;s now part of all our <em>Hobbit<\/em> cast deals.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Whatever damage MEAA is attempting to do &#8212; and it will do damage, since that&#8217;s their principal objective in targeting <em>The Hobbit<\/em> &#8211; we will continue to treat our actors and crew with respect, as we always have.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; As I said earlier, money and power lies behind this threatening  behaviour from our Australian cousins, and to fully understand that, you  simply have to step back and look at the greater picture in context.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; It starts with &#8220;NZ Actors Equity&#8221;. This is a tiny organisation  that represents a small minority of New Zealand Actors. They are not a  Union, and have none of the legal status of a Union. They are a &#8230;  well, a smallish group who have some New Zealand actors as members. How  many actors are members of NZ Equity? They guard that information very  closely, but various reports I&#8217;ve seen put their membership at 200,  although somebody in the know swears it&#8217;s nearer 100.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; How many professional actors are there in New Zealand? Somewhere  between 2000 and 4000, depending on just how you describe a  &#8220;professional actor&#8221;. Obviously most Kiwi actors have other employment  too, but there&#8217;s certainly over 2000 actors available to cast in a film  production.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; So taking the most generous numbers, NZ Actors Equity represents  200 out of 2000 Kiwi actors, or 10%. Perhaps I&#8217;m wrong, and if so, NZ  Equity will no doubt reveal their real membership numbers.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Now there&#8217;s nothing wrong with NZ Actors Equity representing 10% of  the actors in this country. It&#8217;s great that they offer that service,  and if an actor chooses, there&#8217;s a supportive group they can join.  Obviously the more actors that join NZ Equity, the better, since these  organisations usually survive by taking a small percentage of their  members acting fees. I&#8217;m guessing that Equity do something like that.  Recently they have been part-funded by MEAA.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Over the last 10 years our relationship with NZ Equity has been  rocky &#8212; whenever we cast an &#8220;overseas actor&#8221;, we get a letter telling  us why such and such Kiwi actor would be so much better in the role. In  most cases we have already auditioned the actor in question, and formed  our own opinions &#8212; but what strikes me as unfair, is how this &#8220;helpful&#8221;  service of suggesting better choices only includes the &#8220;Equity 200&#8221;. If  you happen to be a good actor who doesn&#8217;t belong to NZ Equity (and many  don&#8217;t), you&#8217;re automatically not good enough to be put forward.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; What really does strike me as wrong, and this is my personal  opinion, is the why that the MEAA is using NZ Actors Equity as a vehicle  to represent the voices and opinions of New Zealand actors. A couple of  years ago, the members of NZ Actors Equity voted to join some kind of  alliance with the Australian MEAA group. At the time, there were voices  of alarm at how this relationship could damage the interest of Kiwi  Actors, but the merger went ahead &#8211; and now we&#8217;re about to find out just  how damaging it&#8217;s going to be.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; As far as I know, the membership of NZ Actors Equity was allowed  into the MEAA, meaning that the Australian MEAA organisation represents  200 out of 2000 Kiwi actors. I don&#8217;t believe it represents non-Equity NZ  actors. It speaks on behalf of a tiny minority of our actors.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; The management of NZ Equity are clearly happy to be used as a  political football by the Australians &#8212; but my sympathy goes to the  1800 New Zealand Actors who are not part of the &#8220;Equity 200&#8221;, but who  are going to suffer the fallout if this <em>Hobbit<\/em> thing goes nuclear.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; I also feel a growing anger at the way this tiny minority is  endangering a project that hundreds of people have worked on over the  last two years, and the thousands about to be employed for the next 4  years. The hundreds of millions of Warner Brothers dollars that is about  to be spent in our economy.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Why is this endangered? Because the &#8220;demands&#8221; of MEAA cannot be  agreed to, or even considered &#8211; by law &#8211; and therefore the only options  that remain involve closing the <em>Hobbit<\/em> down, or more likely  shifting the production to Europe. It could so easily happen. I&#8217;ve been  told that Disney are no longer bring movies to Australia because of  their frustration with the MEAA.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; The MEAA is demanding that the <em>Hobbit<\/em> production company  (Warners owned, 3foot7 Ltd) enter into negotiations for a Union  negotiated agreement covering all performers on the film.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; I personally have a problem with any organisation who represent a  small minority, but attempt to take control of everyone &#8211; but that&#8217;s not  the real issue. The complex web of NZ labour laws are the reason why  this demand will never be agreed to.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; NZ law prohibits engaging in collective bargaining with any labour  organisation representing performers who are independent contractors,  as film actors clearly are. The NZ Commerce Act claims it would be  unlawful to engage with an Australian Union on these matters.<\/p>\n<p>In closing:<\/p>\n<p>My personal opinion is that this is a grab for power. It does not  represent a problem that needs a solution. There will always be  differing opinions when it comes down to work and conditions, but I have  always attempted to treat my actors and crew with fairness and respect.  We have created a very favourable profit sharing pool for the non-Union  actors on <em>The Hobbit<\/em> &#8212; and now the Union is targeting us, despite the fact that we have always respected SAG conditions and residuals.<\/p>\n<p>I can&#8217;t see beyond the ugly spectre of an Australian bully-boy, using  what he perceives as his weak Kiwi cousins to gain a foothold in this  country&#8217;s film industry. They want greater membership, since they get to  increase their bank balance.<\/p>\n<p>The conspiracy theories are numerous, so take your pick: We have done  better in recent years, with attracting overseas movies &#8212; and the  Australians would like a greater slice of the pie, which begins with  them using <em>The Hobbit<\/em> to gain control of our film industry.  There is a twisted logic to seeing NZ humiliated on the world stage, by  losing the Hobbit to Eastern Europe. Warners would take a financial hit  that would cause other studios to steer clear of New Zealand.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Seriously, if the <em>Hobbit<\/em> goes east (Eastern Europe in fact) &#8212; look forward to a long dry big budget movie drought in this country.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Others gain from that too. SAG would much rather have it&#8217;s members  hired on movies &#8212; as opposed to non-SAG actors. The easiest way to  control that, is to stem what are called &#8220;runaway productions&#8221;, which  are American funded films made outside of America. <em>The Hobbit<\/em> is one of them, as was <em>King Kong<\/em> and <em>LOTR<\/em>.  SAG, which is naturally supporting MEAA, would see it&#8217;s own benefit in  studios having a miserable experience in Australia\/New Zealand. That may  well be pushing the conspiracy theories one step too far, and it&#8217;s  perfectly natural that one Union would support another &#8211; but the point  is that in the complex web of Hollywood intrigue, you never really know  who&#8217;s doing what to whom and why.<\/p>\n<p>But it sure feels like we are being attacked simply because we are a  big fat juicy target &#8211; not for any wrong doing. We haven&#8217;t even been  greenlit yet! It feels as if we have a large Aussie cousin kicking sand  in our eyes &#8230; or to put it another way, opportunists exploiting our  film for their own political gain.<\/p>\n<p>Peter Jackson<\/p>\n<p>(NB: This represents Peter Jackson&#8217;s opinion as a Kiwi filmmaker, and  not that of Warner Bros or New Line Cinema, who were not consulted  about this statement.)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Peter Jackson has issued a swift and decisive statement in answer to recent suggestions by the IFA and&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[114,497,115,4,74,148],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hobbit-casting","category-production-directors","category-hobbit-director","category-hobbit-movie","category-jackson","category-hobbit"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1tLoH-a5R","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38803"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38803\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}