{"id":25893,"date":"2003-01-10T09:41:23","date_gmt":"2003-01-10T15:41:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/2003\/01\/10\/elves-hobbits-and-wake-me-when-its-over-2\/"},"modified":"2003-01-10T09:41:23","modified_gmt":"2003-01-10T15:41:23","slug":"elves-hobbits-and-wake-me-when-its-over-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/2003\/01\/10\/25893-elves-hobbits-and-wake-me-when-its-over-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Elves, hobbits and &#8212; wake me when it&#8217;s over"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"intro\">What&#8217;s all this excitement about `Rings&#8217;?<\/p>\n<p>By Patrick T. Reardon <br \/>Tribune staff reporter<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s my problem: Everyone in the universe, particularly every movie reviewer from the loftiest to the most humble, seems to think the &#8220;Lord of the Rings&#8221; trilogy is the greatest thing since sliced bread. And I just don&#8217;t get it.<\/p>\n<p>Critics have praised its storytelling, its landscapes, its imagery. In fact, they&#8217;ve had little criticism to say about either the first or second movie. But I sit watching dumbfounded, or perhaps just dumb.<\/p>\n<p>How much don&#8217;t I get it? Well, I came away from the first movie in such bad humor that I couldn&#8217;t believe it was as bad as I remembered (especially after hearing at every turn how great the film was). So, when &#8220;The Fellowship of the Ring&#8221; came out on video, I rented it, and, halfway through the tape, I discovered part of my problem.<\/p>\n<p>Smack dab in the middle of watching the movie the first time, I&#8217;d fallen asleep. There were battles and characters and plot turns that I&#8217;d never seen before.<\/p>\n<p>Familiar story line<\/p>\n<p>Not that the extra hour added anything to my cinematic enjoyment. For me, the movie was still dreadfully dull. All I could get of the plot was that the Elijah Wood character had a ring that he needed to take somewhere or the world as we know it would end. Basically, the story line of umpteen hundred other movies.<\/p>\n<p>The dialogue often consisted of a lot of dirty, unshaven, disheveled soldier-types huffing and puffing about something. (I could never quite figure out anyone&#8217;s name or even whether Sauron, for instance, was a person or a place.) Or it involved one or another pretty lady (Liv Tyler and Cate Blanchett) talking airily about I don&#8217;t know what. Or there were a bunch of short people and tall people pledging to take some action to keep bad stuff from happening.<\/p>\n<p>It was basically the same story for me when I went recently to watch the second installment in the series, &#8220;The Two Towers.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This time, I did pick up the name of one of the major characters, Aragon, like the place in Spain. (It was only later, while reading a story in the Tribune, that I realized the name is spelled Aragorn.)<\/p>\n<p>But this film, like the earlier one, seemed to be oppressively dark or (in the Tyler flashbacks or flash-forwards or whatever they were) oppressively sweet. Wood&#8217;s character was still a mystery to me. He comes across as this big zero around which all the action happens. (And I like Wood as an actor.) The range of emotion he&#8217;s permitted runs from breathing heavily to express great unrest or breathing very heavily.<\/p>\n<p>The Gollum character is cool, I acknowledge. For me, he was the saving grace that made the second movie slightly more watchable than the first. He struck me as a first cousin to Dobby in the second installment of the Harry Potter opus. He also struck me as more human &#8212; in the sense of having a variety of emotions &#8212; than anyone else in the movie.<\/p>\n<p>And, I have to admit, midway through the second movie, I started to doze off. I never dropped off completely into sleep. That was progress. But my eyes grew heavy and my attention wandered.<\/p>\n<p>The fault I&#8217;m sure is in me. I didn&#8217;t read the books, for one thing. So it&#8217;s as if I&#8217;m walking into the middle of someone&#8217;s party.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not prejudice<\/p>\n<p>But I&#8217;ve never read the Brian Aldiss short story that was the basis for Steven Spielberg&#8217;s &#8220;A.I.: Artificial Intelligence.&#8221; Nor have I read Winston Groom&#8217;s novel &#8220;Forrest Gump,&#8221; the basis of the Robert Zemeckis film. Yet, I enjoyed both of those movies.<\/p>\n<p>And it&#8217;s not that I have a prejudice against the-battle-of-good-versus-evil sorts of films. I thoroughly enjoyed John Boorman&#8217;s nitty-gritty take on the King Arthur legend, &#8220;Excalibur,&#8221; and was delighted with George Lucas&#8217; &#8220;Star Wars: Episode I &#8212; the Phantom Menace,&#8221; particularly with the way the movie used special effects to create other worlds.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t have a prejudice either against Peter Jackson and his &#8220;Lord of the Rings&#8221; films because he&#8217;s from Down Under and filmed in New Zealand. One of my favorite movies is &#8220;Moulin Rouge&#8221; by Australian Baz Luhrmann.<\/p>\n<p>My point is: I&#8217;m confused. I like movies. I like epics. I like films that challenge the viewer. But I fall asleep during &#8220;Lord of the Rings.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Everyone, it seems, believes these films to be cinematic masterpieces. But, for me &#8212; I don&#8217;t know. I can&#8217;t see it.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe this is a medical condition. Or a psychological syndrome. It can&#8217;t be that the movies actually are turgid, overblown, overhyped Gargantuas &#8212; cultural curiosities that will look silly 10, 20 years down the road and lead future generations to ask, &#8220;What were they thinking?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>No, it couldn&#8217;t be that.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe for the third one, I&#8217;ll bring along No-Doz<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What&#8217;s all this excitement about `Rings&#8217;? By Patrick T. Reardon Tribune staff reporter Here&#8217;s my problem: Everyone in&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[138],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-old-special-reports"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1tLoH-6JD","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theonering.net\/torwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}