Support TheOneRing.net - A not for profit fan community!
Join us in our 24 Hour Chatroom!
Order the Gollum Enraged - Click Here
Shirebucks Coffee - Click Here

Get emailed with every new post!

Weekly Newsletter

Joining TheOneRing.net newsletter is a great way to guarantee you are always on top of the latest news from the world of JRR Tolkien. And that's not all - because of our great relationships with Tolkien related entities worldwide, we often send out some amazing opportunities available no where else! Don't miss out - Join today!

Select a list:

Twitter Tracker

  1. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Spending Saturday night debating if the Battle Of Five Armies or Bank Of America will rule the #BOFA tag

  2. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Through night and day, Over snow under mountain, In light and dark, We always #Run3rd for Frodo! Good luck @SeanAstin in Montreal

  3. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Please share photos of Hobbits and Elves at Montreal or Cincinnati! Legolas still thinks they're taking the Hobbits to... you know.

  4. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: Stay safe Colorado! If you hear a fell voice on the air, make for the mines RT @MorrisonMuseum: Flood/Flash Flood Warning for Morrison

  5. TheOneRing.net
    TheOneRing.net: This Middle Earth Meetup Minute is brought to you by Shirebucks. The finest brew this side of Buckland. http://t.co/BEl3g34lEq

Why The Hobbit movie’s divergences are beneficial

September 13, 2013 at 10:45 pm by Demosthenes  - 

The Hobbit Bag End Door Another interesting thought-piece that I stumbled on in my Middle-earth wanderings across the internet. In this article, Tolkien scholar Michael Martinez tackles the eternally vexing question of textual fidelity and why he feels that the divergences between novel and film are beneficial.


THERE is a certain amount of creative license that enters into any film adaptation of a book. And history teaches us that no matter how faithful (or unfaithful) a film adaptation is with respect to its original source, someone will complain about the movie’s (un)faithfulness to the books.

For example, I loved the first two “Harry Potter” movies, which I felt were extremely imaginative and creative. I had never seen children’s movies before where the actors were actually called upon to ACT. Compare the lively, engaged performances of the adults in “Harry Potter and the Sorceror’s Stone” with the wooden performances of otherwise perfectly good actors in classic children’s films like “Mio in the Land of Faraway”, “The Witches”, “The Neverending Story”, and so on. You almost have to go back to Edmund Guinn in “Miracle on 34th Street” to see anything like an adult actor taking a children’s story seriously enough to treat it with respect (well, “Mary Poppins” and “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” were pretty good).

But I digress from the main point. Movies can be very faithful to the book, and one of the criticisms that my Harry Potter fan friends who had read the books before watching the movies complained about was that the movies were boring and predictable. They followed the books very closely (even while cutting out a bit of material).

But then along came “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban”, which Alfonso Cuarón directed — totally changing the tone and character of the film franchise — and people complained that his film was too UNLIKE the book. Talk about injecting a Goldilocks Syndrome into a fanbase, you just cannot find people agreeing on when the “Harry Potter” movies are just right even up to the last film (which some people hate for all sorts of reasons — but I loved it).

[Read More]

Posted in Green Books, Hobbit Book, Hobbit Movie, J.R.R. Tolkien, The Hobbit, Tolkien on September 13, 2013 by
Source: Xenite.org

Barnes & Noble