Support TheOneRing.net - A not for profit fan community!
Join us in our 24 Hour Chatroom!
LEGO Lord of the Rings Collection
Order the Gollum Enraged - Click Here

Ringer Reviews - The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug


Letter of Name/Alias: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Ringer Review - NAME

Libby


Date Posted: 2014-01-02
Tolkien Fan Level: 6
Film Format Seen? 3D 48 fps
Will view again in a different format? Yes
 Rings!

So after the final 'boom,' when the screen went dark, I'm fairly certain that my first reaction was to say (very loudly) 'THEY CANNOT END IT THERE!' This is mainly because, in my mind, the logical place to put the split was after the chapter 'Fire and Water,' and as I managed to guess the first split correctly, I was left slightly stunned by the fact that I was wrong, and very stunned by the cliffhanger on which the film ended.
Being so obsessed with Tolkien to the point that I taught my A-level English teacher the correct pronunciation of 'Smaug,' (incidentally, the film got it right, there's a note in the back of the Silmarillion that says so,) I feel that I have a pretty good grasp of Middle Earth. And what I think a lot of critics were concerned with are the changes to the book. Yet I feel that some of the changes are welcome. Can I blame Peter Jackson for turning the relatively quiet barrel scene that featured in the book where they all drift stealthily down the river into a no-holds-barred action sequence which must have been the most fun part of this film for all involved? No. Can I blame him for fleshing out Lake-Town into a borderline dictatorship led by corrupt officials slightly reminiscent of Rohan under Saruman's control? No. Can I fault him for including a strong female character who seems to be perfectly capable of taking her own initiative and standing up for what she believes to be right? Well, maybe a bit, but only because she had to go and fall in love. (I hate romance at the best of times, and the feminist in me wanted her response to the question 'Do you think she could have loved me?' to be 'No,' but I sense that might have killed the moment.) Why can I not blame Peter Jackson for these things (except the Kili/Tauriel romance)? Because I really enjoyed them. The vast majority of the part of the book which this film covers features talking, walking, sitting, waiting, wishing, and about half a chapter of fighting. Given as how one of the biggest criticisms of the last film was that very little action happened, and that the endless characterisation and explaining of the back-story for those that haven't read the book caused the film to drag, I can hardly blame Peter Jackson for livening things up. Tolkien himself describes one of the scenes as the 'dreariest and dullest part' of the adventure, and I enjoyed the added action. Did I think that there was too much? Perhaps. Did Peter Jackson overstep the boundary of artistic licence and turn this into a new medium of fan fiction? He was pushing the boundary, but I don't think he overstepped it. As I said, I loved the barrel sequence, and I thought that there was a pleasing cat-and-mouse quality to Smaug and the dwarves. Covering Smaug in gold could be seen as a touch excessive, but I really liked it. (CAN ANYONE ELSE SEE THE REFERENCE TO GAME OF THRONES IN THAT BIT???) I thought that the acting was fantastic, (I teared up when they entered Erebor - well done, Richard Armitage and Ken Stott, it takes a lot to make me cry, and Martin Freeman's expression when first facing Smaug was so believable. AND BILBO BECOMING OBSESSED WITH THE RING AND THORIN WITH THE ARKENSTONE!) I liked the characterisation of Tauriel, but I think she would have attracted a lot less criticism if it hadn't been for the love triangle. The one great redeeming feature of it is knowing how it ends. Certainly, if they'd become friends, I would have been fine with that, but falling in love... But this is a personal opinion. Feel free to disagree with me.

It had its flaws, but in all, I thought it was a good film, no matter how much of the book they changed. And I think that a lot of people lose sight of that. It is an adaptation, not a word-by-word retelling. This book has been out for seventy-six years, Peter Jackson (as a film-maker) does need to change things in order to keep his audience interested. I love an unexpected plot twist as much as the next person. Did he cross a line? I don't think so. Could he have toned down the action and included more characterisation? Probably, but there probably is more of the latter in the extended version. How much of this review can be attributed to tunnel vision? I don't know. But I know that I'm looking forward to part 3.

The Ratings
The Other Ratings
Martin Freeman 's performance as Bilbo Baggins?
How would you rate Luke Evan's performance as Bard??
The Overall representation of The Dwarves ?
How would you rate Benedict Cumberbatch's' performance as Smaug?
Ian McKellen's performance as Gandalf?
How would you rate Lee Pace's performance as Thranduil?
How would you rate Orlando Bloom's performance as Legolas?
How would you rate Evangeline Lilly's performance as Tauriel?
How would you rate Stephen Fry's performance as Master of Lake-Town?
Did you think Tauriel was a welcome addition to the film?
How would you rate Beorn?
How would you rate the scene with the Spiders?
How would you rate the imprisonment/escape sequence?
Did you like the Necromancer being discovered by Gandalf as Sauron?
Did the movie fairly portray the character arc of Thorrin?
How would you rate Lake-Town?
How would you rate the burglar interchange between Bilbo and Smaug?
How would you rate revisiting Bree?
How happy are you with the attempts to tie The Hobbit back to the Lord of the Rings?
Did you enjoy seeing Gandalf visit Gol Duldor and The Tombs?
Did you like the splitting of the company of Dwarves?
Did Smaug live up to your expectations?
How would you rate the ending of the movie; in regards to leading well into the next film, and serving as a good ending point.
Is DOS a better film than AUJ?
The overall pace of the film.






Review HomeSubmit a Review