Batman
31, Merritt Island
United States
Date Posted: 2012-12-16
Tolkien Fan Level: 10
Film Format Seen? 3D 48 fps
Will view again in a different format? Yes
the bad reviews that came out before the hobbit premiere were simply a load of "you know what". The 48 fps 3d was amazing, crisp, clear and never blurry, (never). However, I will state that a friend of mine that was with me to see it in 48 fps 3d went the following day to see it with his wife in a theatre that claimed to be showing it in hi resolution 3d and boy were they lying. Just moments after the start of the film it was clear to my friend Ben that the theatre was falsely advertising 48fps 3d. It was nothing of that sort, in fact the camera bulb was so low the film was incredibly dark. That theatre should be reprimanded for false advertising and for staining Peter Jackson's film. I feel bad for all the movie goers who when to see the film thinking it was in the 48 fps 3d when it was totally not. I hope the movie goers will figure out the theaters fallacy and not think the hobbit was a horrible movie because of the cheapness of this theatre.
Getting back to the real 48 fps, again, it was awesome. You are immersed in the movie in a way that has never been done before. You must see it at 48 fps 3d, you just must. What Star Wars A New Hope did for the movie industry and audiences, will be the same impact that the Hobbit will have in this generation of movie goers. Peter jackson, my hat goes off to you!!!!!


Richard Armitage 's performance as Thorin?
Bilbo's retelling of the history of Erebor and of Thror/Thrain/Thorin
The Eagles rescue sequence?
The representation of the
Arkenstone?
The first glimpses of
Smaug?
The
ending of the movie; in regards to leading well into the next film, and serving as a good ending point.
Review Home
Submit a Review